Hi, I have been having a ball shooting my Crosman 2240 handguns. I came across a YouTube video where a guy measured the number of shots from a CO2 cartridge when shortening the hammer spring, see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siFqYiW6NJU&t=4sI shortened the 2" hammer springs to 1.75" and measured the velocity using both the original and shortened hammer spring.
Both the .22 and .177 pistol have a 10.1" barrel. I chronographed the velocity using both the original 2" and shortened 1.75" spring.
.22 Crosman 2240 pistol:
2" spring, 464fps
1.75" spring 458fps
The shorter spring lost 6fps.
.177 Crosman 2240 pistol
2" spring 508fps
1.75" spring 510fps
The shorter spring gained 2fps.
This experiment shows that shorting the hammer spring has almost no effect on velocity. However, if the video is correct the shorter spring almost doubles the number of shots from a CO2 cylinder.
I suspect that Crosman makes more money on the the disposable components than the original handgun. I did not measure the number of shots per CO2 cylinder, but believe the results of the YouTube guy:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmzKjAoUb3EMore shots per CO2 cylinder makes a lot of sense to me.
My 1851 BP revolvers are tack drivers, but these pellet guns are gnat destroyers.
Maybe we should have a pellet gun section of this message board?
Regards,
Richard